View Single Post
  #2  
Old January 10th, 2009, 03:17 PM

Charles22 Charles22 is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 274
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Charles22 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Long campaign questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by RERomine View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles22 View Post
So maybe Operation Barbarossa had 20 more tanks kills than what was historic by your performance, that wouldn't have changed things in all but a very local area.
Yet, one would think after my battalion has destroyed several thousand British tanks in North Africa, we would be pushing into Cairo in 1943 instead of back to Tunisia, but I understand the global aspect of the game is scripted.
But supposedly the front is always much larger than your force. Have you forgot about those priceless Italians though? Just the Italians alone dwarf your force. Anyway, you see what good it does, don't you? This is clearly a fantasy front.

You destroy 50 million and they just keep on coming. So while your front doesn't change because of radical Britisher transport to your front, some guy somewhere else should be doing Sealion with ease, but he cannot play this game in a different campaign alongside your own. If you were playing against the BEF in France, or doing a Sealion, you would see the same thing, where those Britisher pigs would always be in full force wherever you go.

Lesson is the incompetent commanders always have the soft front. Your problem is you draw their attention. Try doing the opposite of Rommel. Instead of blowing up dummy tanks to scare the enemy, Hide your forces and even leave a few seemingly crawling, desparate, for water Italins crawling around on the ground for recon to see, and you just might see the other commander get all the British reinforcements for a change.
Reply With Quote