View Single Post
  #2470  
Old January 17th, 2009, 11:59 PM

MaxWilson MaxWilson is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
MaxWilson is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Bug Thread: Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMorrison View Post
Why is it a good idea though? More fatigue, more loss of resistances, and you don't go higher Prot than you would have from Ironskin in the first place.
Hmmm. I just tested this, and we're both wrong, Jim. You don't get 22 Prot (Stoneskin is supposed to give you +2 on top of whatever you had before), but you *also* don't get more loss of resistances. I tried both variations:

Ironskin, Stoneskin: Scripted stoneskin gets overridden completely. Thug cast Holy Avenger or Blade Wind (ack!).

Stoneskin, Ironskin: Both spells were cast. Prot was as if only Ironskin had been cast. Cold vulnerability (50) went away (!) when Ironskin was cast, and Shock vulnerability (75) replaced it.

-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"

["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MaxWilson For This Useful Post: