Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by VedalkenBear  JM: While I can understand that, I think you are accepting the current state of software design as the only state possible, which I vehemently disagree with. | 
	
 Half-empty, half-full...it's still only half a glass.
	Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by VedalkenBear  I myself have been trained never to say that something exists in a piece of software until after it is debugged.  Therefore, when I see something on the progress site, I have assumed that not only was it implemented, but it is working.  Apparently, that is in error. | 
	
 debugged != working (for all cases of "working")
Debugged just means that it works in each case the developer thought of/tested.
What you really want is 100% comprehensive use case based regression testing...and then you have to be sure that your tests actually do cover all code paths.  A very nice ideal, but consider that the dev team consists of exactly 2 individuals, only one of which does logic programming.
...so, any news on the new "developer daemon" summons in the next release for Jomon? :-)