Quote:
Originally Posted by gila
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reset
I think it all depends on mission type,what type of force you have chosen,enemy faced,and overall disposition to recon.
As an example i am trying out a armored infantry battalion,long campaign,during meeting engagements the scouts are never meant to engage but locate enemy forces then fall back upon the main force while keeping in contact,in the safest manner with the enemy.Thereby allowing the main force to meet them in the most advantageous manner possible.
During advance or assault their main mission is to move ahead of the main force then once shots are fired to fall back while the heavy lifters take up the slack.
During Defend and Delay they are to determine the main axis of advance..then fall back.
At no time should lightly armed/armored scout units fight it out,and even if they do their first priority should be to find a way out of the engagement with the least risk to themselves.
What they do allow you to do:
Setup roadblocks or ambushes.
Concentrate your forces to meet an oncoming force or to find a weak spot and once gain to concentrate your efforts and firepower on a breakthrough.
I was with you all the way until you made this statement.
A single armored car or scout is as valueable as a platoon of infantry or armor.
|
Can pltatoon of infr. be ko'd by a single shot?
And i always thought infr. is much better at bushwacking,but that may be only my opinion. |
But first they have to get there
Rate of speed is important because warfare is inherently geographic in nature. The fundamental military problem in steel panthers is a space-time problem, as Nathan Bedford Forrest succinctly observed "getting there firstest with the mostest." For bushwhacking a platoon of infantry, a platoon of infantry would be best
but against the side/rear armor of an AFV a swift and well armed scout car is the choice that produces the goods
Andrew