Quote:
Originally Posted by narwan
NATO TI vs WP non TI can be a problem in games where the parameters (points and map size) are chosen to fit the (much more expensive) NATO force (which happens all the time). That means that if you can buy enough TI equipment to cover your entire front line adequately and with some to spare you've either got far too many points or a map that's much too small.
Under such circumstances the numerical advantage of the WP accounts for far less than it should. WP forces weren't supposed to blindly throw themselves at enemy strong points. A specific setup should allow for manouvre to play a significant part.
And compensate the WP by giving them plenty of air points (more than NATO as they employed far more aircraft and helicopters for CCS).
Narwan
|
I see what you are saying but it was either Don or Andy that said under no circumstances would the map and unit limit be getting bigger, so TI will always be king. For me I only use the 80x100 and I never have even reached the limit for core. But for a pro I could see how these two things could be a grave disappointment.
Andrew