[Slaughtermeyer]

Originally Posted by Edi

It's also telling that you dismiss the substance of the article simply because some people made comments on it that you don't like. Would you like to address the point, or will you concede?

Another piece of well researched evidence on the WTC 7 fire. So much for the claims that "there were only small fires that could not have caused a structural collapse".

Very well, i'll get specific. The material you reference doesn't even try to explain away the fact that FEMA found something never before observed in building fires. "A novel phenomenon--called a eutectic reaction--occurred at the surface, causing intergranular melting capable of turning a solid steel girder into Swiss cheese." The New York Times reported the FEMA statement that "steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures" and that these findings are "perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation." Steel does not evaporate unless it is heated to at least 5000 degrees Fahrenheit.

The Scheuerman article which you linked earlier cleverly tries to get us to believe that perhaps there was no molten steel at all, despite FEMA's confirmation that steel was "partly evaporated." He does this by saying that the molten metal was actually "lead or the aluminum from the plane which were probably the metals that were seen flowing through the pile" and/or "lead, tin, silver and even gold used in the computer circuit boards."

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...rgy/index.html

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...80829205835711