Quote:
Originally Posted by Imp
Don
Okay so the Abrams is the exeption due to training the criteria for not having a carry capacity are missile defence or reactive armour. It was the fact the Abrams cant & the Leo can that first struck me as why.
Finland MBT (15) T-55MS has VIRSS & carry capacity is only one I know of that does not conform.
|
I have the seating diagram for an M1 somewhere in the US Army PDF field manuals. I cannot find it but recall several problems, which may be why it is only used non-tactically.
- The engine exhaust causes problems with possible cooked troops. Thus loading and unloading requires care, and not to be done over the rear. So probably only at the halt (no turning tracks to eat troops limbs).
- The M1 has to
disengage turret traverse while carrying.
- the section had to sit in a set pattern on the
turret top - not the rear engine decks.
Cannot recall if any discussion of the blow out ammo panels not being sat on - as if they had suffered a catastrophic hit that caused the blow outs to pop then the infantry section would likely already be strawberry jam a few milliseconds before that event happened!.
In reality - M1s in combat have enough kit tied all over the turret that the clean configuration required to give some guys a lift is not available. And US formations will have enough APCS and Humvees that administrative lift perched on top of the turret is not needed.
Tactically - the requirement to halt for mounting, take extrem care from exhaust heat, disengagement of the gun turret, and the highly exposed position of the grunts all sat around the rim of the turret, are all
bad. Tank riding is just not needed.
Andy