Quote:
What I meant was that at the beginning all nations have the same number of pretender points. Each completed game shifts starting points for new games up or down 1 depending on who won.
Control is definitely an issue - I'm not sure the best way to handle that. I'm sure it would be possible though, perhaps with too much admin intervention required.
|
too complex for my tastes and control is non existent (at least without much supervision as u say)
Quote:
|
Without some sort of handicap, playing a league where people will naturally want to do well, I think we'd get serious over-representation of the more powerful nations.
|
that is a very valid point
Quote:
Another option would be to split the nations into tiers that only fight each other. So within EA there would be three tiers, perhaps:
Tier 1 - niefels, sauro, mictlan, lanka, hinnom
Tier 2 - vanheim, abysia, ermor..
Tier 3 - kailasa, yomi, marverni ..
This would keep duels relatively fair, albeit restrictive of variety
|
that would work but
a) i dont 100% believe in the severe unbalance yet
b) do we really want that much restriction?
i do understand your point though
Quote:
|
Note that I think players should be limited to 1 duel at a time (within the league) so that we don't get a vast gap in numbers of games played by different players.
|
that makes sense. non-ranked games can always be played