Re: VS League
DarkSha, I have NO thought that EA Arco is in any way a powerhouse. In fact with me at the helm I should get a running start whoever I played.
I think your Idea is great on a ladder, but I am not that versed on many nations and I think there is a LOT of people who would love to play 1 on 1 but not agianst a really good player playing a powerhouse Nation.
There was a ladder called Leadeaters about 8 years ago (had to do with stratgy games across a broad spectrum) and they assigned points for the particular battle you where going to play, side you took and skill levels.
I played Cilvil War Generals 2, but there where a number of games involved in this 'Ladder' all mixed together with points for battles, Draws, Minor wins, and Major wins (likewise you took points off for the same losses).
It also factored in WHO you where playing so If a General played a privite and got a major win he might get 20 point....iF the privite won, he might get 100.
(Eveyone started as a reruit and went up the ranks..Privite, corporal ect)
It was a different era and differnt type of games as they where mostly tactical and there certainly was no magic. But the premise remains the same.
I don't get to toot my horn very often but I retired as the only 5tar General they ever had ( As I siad it was mostly on one game CWG2 and there where only 2 sides to take so it wasn;t that big of a deal, but it was to me at the time).
You might look at this post and see if there is something you could take out of it that would make EVERYONE feel like it was worthwhile to play Executor ect.
Also you might want to set up games like Marverni agianst Arco..or perhaps Mictlan agianst Pangea ect...
Just an opinion.
|