View Single Post
  #1  
Old September 22nd, 2009, 12:33 PM

Calahan Calahan is offline
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
Calahan is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Sign of the Hammer - A Warhammer Mod Game. Send Pretenders!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sombre View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrelloid View Post
People are downplaying magic weapons in this context, but they were such a big deal for TNN when the topic of their sacreds came up on the IRC channel... Make up your minds - are magic weapons good or just a minor advantage?
I don't know who people are. I don't consider magic weapons on regular troops a massive deal. It's certainly very nice to have on PD though and it's another national advantage. I did consider it when balancing.
I guess I'm 'people' in this context I know given the choice between two identical units, I'd pay 10-15% extra for a magic weapon. Mainly because it cuts down on the tactics your opponents can use against you. Like everything though it's all situationally dependent. But I can recall games where I've thought "ah yes, that's a good tactic to use" and then upon closer checking of the enemy roster, I've had to say "arse, XYZ has magic weapons. So that idea's no good then".

I view less options for your enemy as meaning they are easier to predict, and therefore easier to defeat. Everyone has different tastes of course, but I would feel a lot safer neighbouring for example, an Elephant nation, if I knew I had magic weapons on hand.

Edit:
Quote:
Originally Posted by archaeolept View Post
..... or they don't know what they're talking about.
The odds of that is somewhere between highly probable and an absolute certainty
Reply With Quote