Quote:
Originally Posted by SciencePro
Lets say you are playing a multiplayer game and a nation, lets call them "empire A," agrees to a NAP-3 with you. At the time you happen to be at war with Empire B. Empire B asks Empire A to make a trade where Empire B gets items or gems and Empire A casts some anonymous remote attack or assassination spells against you. You don't know what happend at first, but you ask about it and both players tell you what happened.
My question is:
Has empire A violated the terms of your NAP-3?
|
Science,
I would suggest you search for the NAP thread awhile ago where this was significantly discussed.
Usually, remote attack spells are not considered to be a violation of a NAP, because it is impossible to prove authorship.
However, in the clear cut case where the author has admitted that he did then yes I would say that you are freed of any NAP obligation.