Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
So I would tend to fault the manual only for things that are wrong. And only if they were wrong at the time it was created, not changed later. Its all impressions unless someone wants to create some actual percentages but my impression is that the manual is 99% good. That is if you arent expecting a strategy guide or a complete code breakdown. That was left to us to do and I think we did it very well.
|
Feh. It's not a matter of fault. Who cares which problems in the manual are justified or not? This thread is about the state of the manual
now, not when it was written. Has it been updated? No. Does that mean it isn't reliable? Yes.
This does not indicate a judgement of the devs, Bruce Geryk or anyone else. It definitely raises the topic of documentation generally, but that discussion does not have to involve finding fault.