Quote:
Originally Posted by Septimius Severus
This is the situation as it stands:
Chris says that his team will likely not want to play on unless a rollback is done.
|
Not exactly. Not one played voted to continue.
Quote:
|
If a team or player has breached a built-in messaging limit in the game that has caused them to lose gold or items or a bug has occured (perhaps because of player actions) that is inherant in the game that is known about and that we have no control over
|
I do not understand your statement. Neither of those conditions are true. The bug is controllable. The only person that claimed to have some idea of the bug was DrP and he was consistently wrong on the details.
Quote:
If team ACGHHS wants to bring in an expert to examine files to determine whether the limit has been breached that is fine, unless I hear from someone very high up that this justifies that we immediately do a rollback without all players consent, we go with what the everyone in the game wants to do via majority vote.
|
I really don't understand what you're asking me to accomplish here. What does "higher up" entail - anyone that is an acknowledged veteran of the game?
As I've seen the turns, anyone that examines the turns will conclude that the game did in fact eat items. But fine, I'll go see if I can trouble a vet to verify what squirrel has said, and that he thinks its worth a rollback. I do think it should be a matter of honor that squirrel doesn't lie, but.. ok.
[/quote]