Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
Some do tho none at the moment. Most actually cut up cbm into pieces and play with just the pretender parts or the gengen parts.
|
Really? Do you have any actual statistics on this? Because it was only within the last month that Edi even released such a version of CBM 1.6, and the something awful forums have a tiny number of games compared to Llamaserver. And guess what. Not a single game on Llamaserver is using such a sliced up version of CBM 1.6
Quote:
|
I guess if I wanted my "opinion on CBM to carry any weight" Id play more of them and join in on the cbm conversation thread. But my only opinion on cbm is that its not worthy of becoming the "de facto standard" of Dom3.
|
Yes, we're well aware that you're ignorant. Are you still going to prattle on about how putting black hearts on Pan's and assinating independent commanders is a great way to expand in the early game?
Quote:
|
That might be true of Sombre's forums. Im not sure about 80% here.
|
It was shown to you several months ago that well over 80% (closer to 95%) of all games on Llamaserver are using a version of CBM. Can you please try and utilize the actual evidence instead of your imagination? Evidence has value. Your statements based on what you think do not.
Quote:
|
So the feeling is that only those who can win games using cbm are qualified opinions on why cbm is good?
|
Here Parker indicates that he likes to utilize strawman arguments. Nobody has made this statement other than you. Can you please try and debate honestly? Or is that impossible for a paid Shrapnel shill?
But really. Could you please try and base your arguments on reality instead of your imagination?