View Single Post
  #3  
Old July 26th, 2010, 02:51 PM
Marcello's Avatar

Marcello Marcello is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
Marcello is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is CM Artillery too destructive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGTGunn View Post
CBU-97's were used in OIF with some success and AFAIK are still in production and USAF inventory. The biggest problem these days is a lack of appropriate targets worth expending a CBU-97 on.
That would make some sense, as noted if the **** really hits the fan a bomber can be armed with them, take off from the USA and drop them in Iran, Korea or whatever. This way the most can be made of a limited stockpile of specialized weapons.
On the other hand artillery rounds would need to be stored ready at hands, which would require a larger number of them to cover all possible fronts or limit them only to campaigns like OIF.
SADARM worked too, by the accounts; nevertheless it was cut in 2001. Lack of urgent threat is certainly the primary issue, but cost and technical reasons may have played a role.
Reply With Quote