Quote:
Originally Posted by theenemy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
The comment about "If you need to play a game a certain way to get enjoyment out of it then it's a bad game I reckon." can also go both ways.
|
For me this comment can only go in one way, but enlighten me on how this can be a positive thing? |
I took it to be that you were saying if it can only be played solo then its a bad game. By "both ways" I meant that a game which can only be played mp might also be considered by some to be a bad game.
Quote:
|
I believe that making game mechanics enjoyable is the job of the devs. and not the gamers.(yea yea dom3 is an indie game made by two guys yadda yadda... but still)
|
I might have said mission, not job. And it can be the mission of the player community as well as it can be the mission of the devs. To say its the "job" of the devs is rather defeating and dead end in this case.
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
Its pretty cool that a game is able to support multiple versions of play.
|
PS: Just out of curiosity Gandalf; would you pay 50 bucks for Dom3 if it was an SP-game only and there was NO way to play it in MP?
|
I have in the past for similar. For that matter, it might as well be said that I did for Dom3. I was already tired of it in multiplay before it was released yet I did pay for a couple of copies.
But if it had been developed for solo play only, then even more so. If the game had been developed with only one or the other in mind then I suspect it would have done a better job of it.