[geoschmo]

Originally posted by Growltigga:
The initial argument was not quite what you suggest. My opening position on this matter was (and I still hold) that a subject such as genocide is not appropriate material for any kind of game or as the basis for a 'joke' web-site.

You then stated that this was perfectly acceptable under the first amendment.

Please note that I made no attempt at a qualitative judgment of this type. I would never assert that sicko humor was "acceptable", "unacceptable", "appropriate", or "inappropriate". These arguments are too subjective and require too much in the way of presuposition on the part of the participants to be suitable for an open debate such as this. My initial point was merely to whether or not it was "permissable" under the principle of free speech. If you ask me whether I think it appropriate, I would agree with you in most cases, as I consider myself a man of decent moral fiber. However, in the specific case of this website I may question that as I have taken the time to review it (the site) more completely since we began our discussion, and I feel now we may have been to harsh in our initial criticism of it.

If this is to be a debate strictly on a legal basis, on whether or not a court (US or UK) could be convinced that this website is not protected under the principle of freedom of speech, then I shall have to conceed you have an advantage on me. However, I will point out that "the law" as you no doubt are aware is constantly shifting sand with which to build a foundation. Many priciples thought immutable by previous generations now are "re-evaluated". You may make an assertion that were a case to come to court today over this issue, your position could be victorius, but that would not make it "right". I conceed this is an idealistic perspective from which to base an argument on my part, but I was suffering from the delusion that ideals were what this discussion was about.

I do find it interesting though that when you make various aside arguments it is permissable under the "progression" of the discussion. But when I attempt to do so, or even redirect your aside back to the previuos point at hand, I am in "left field".

Geo