Quote:
Originally Posted by RightDeve
Imagine a situation this way: you're in a PBeM battle against someone and the rule said "e-mail diplomacy will either mean decisive victory or decisive defeat". That is, if you think you can no longer put up a fight, you have two choices: 1)Make e-mail diplomacy (surrendering, hence decisive defeat), or 2)Retreat to the gray hexes and avoid more losses (so at least you can achieve a minor defeat or even a draw).
Viewed from opponent's point of view, he will either surround your forces to achieve complete isolation and squeeze what last points he can get out of your forces, or, he will continually send you surrender e-mail. (if we assume that winning streak is so important for both sides).
What you said is not generally an encirclement, Marcello. It can be achieved either by flanking, or infiltration. So maybe I can say that FULL encirclement in SP doesnt have any significant effect (unless you're under the situation I stated above) ?
|
Against a human opponent - consider the
psychological effects of a force appearing in his rear.
Even a small raid can have effects way beyond their points value as the opponent shifts attacking forces off-mission to deal with the threat, race back to protect his arty park of guns, SAMS and ammo carriers etc.
This is especially true of the sort of player that does not consider maintaining a reserve is necessary
!.
Also - in the defence or delay, you should always walk a few little infantry ambushes (and/or a couple of scout cars with a decent cannon - the Fox, say) forwards of the deployment lines if the terrain (cover) permits. A human opponent may be demoralised by being "bumped" in what he had considered no-man's land. You may get a kill opportunity on a juicy bunched-up road column of loaded APCs etc which he was planning to go tactical with a turn or so later on. That is perhaps not the usual idea of "flanking" - but it is, in a small way.
Andy