[Samhain]

I see your point, bbz. And, I also consent that I do not agree with all of the stipulations for NAP set by my cited thread's author, LoloMo. My purpose in pointing out that thread was that the rule of overcasting another's global is considered a violation of NAP is not universal. There was, as I pointed out, at least one veteran player who made a statement I interpreted to also agree with LoloMo's and myself on the matter. There were also many others who posted disagreements with some of the authors rules but, notably to me at least, not that one. To me, that seemed to indicate that this was acceptable.

Especially as my Mother Oak was cast the very turn after I agreed to NAP, if I thought it would violate, I would have just delayed my response to the PM until after the turn was run.

Consistent with my apparently less strict view of NAP, I did not confront R'lyeh on the subject of the anonymous spell attacks until after the second and even then only to ask if he had cast them. When he denied it, I let it drop. If he had admitted the attacks, I would not have accused him of breaking NAP only of violating my understanding of our agreement and offered him a chance to renegotiate or suffer the same. I still, however, would not have moved troops into his territories without the before agreed upon 3 turns notice.