May 28th, 2011, 12:16 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Córdoba-Argentina
Posts: 643
Thanks: 90
Thanked 77 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Re: WinSPMBT "house rules"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cross
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roman
I personally prefer more general rules. One might think of points in general. For example:
1) Map (size, terrain, visibility ...)
2) Point of purchase units
3) Restriction of units (size zero, air points, armor .....)
4) Location of VPs
Interestingly suggesting Cross, but it seems very detailed. I think the less rules the imagination flies. I also think that in war there are no rules.  
If players want to recreate a special field for battle if it can create more detailed rules.
Greetings |
My 'preferences' are just that, preferences not rules. It's just a list of things that I may want to think about and discuss with an opponent prior to a battle. It's a reference tool.
And I disagree  war does have rules of engagement.
I play battles with almost no rules, and some with detailed agreements.
If I was to play against you, we may agree to have no rules. 
Cross
Cross |
I was talking about real war. 
__________________
"We are free and nothing else matters"
Jose de San Martin.
|