View Single Post
  #16  
Old December 3rd, 2011, 05:13 PM
Suhiir's Avatar

Suhiir Suhiir is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
Suhiir is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Counter-Battery Process?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FASTBOAT TOUGH View Post
7. The next again is for the CORPS (And everyone else to!) out there with a little CCR to make things right with the world.
http://www.12thmarineartilleryregime...Battery-A.html
The M107 (using the M113 175mm gun) and M110 (using the M201 203mm howitzer) SP artillery both use the same chassis it's merely a matter of which gun (175 or 203) is mounted on it. For practical reasons a given battery will generally stick to one tube or the other.

The last M110 was phased out of USMC inventory in 1991 (they did not participate in Gulf I) as were the reserve M113 gun tubes (last used actively c.a. 1978).

All that said

Hard to beat 175's for counter-battery (at least till the advent of rocket assisted shells), then again that's specifically what they were designed for.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie

People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote