View Single Post
  #24  
Old February 12th, 2012, 12:26 PM

Torgon Torgon is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 253
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Torgon is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Back again after absence, polling interest for a MA (learning) game

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendigo_reloaded View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torgon View Post
Basically everything comes down to forge a boat load of gem gens, forge a bunch of hammers, get GoH or chalice, summon Tarts, win.
You have the settings ingame to limit all of the above, if they are a problem in your games:
Play games with harder research, or 8 provinces/player with 6 player max, lower magic sites...and you will not see a single Tartarian. Or play against more agresive players.

I played many games of Dom PPP and we hardly ever got to lv9 spells. Pretty much the same with Dom2. Dom3 I have played little in MP, but I know it is even more customizable that those were.

I would also like to add that endgame strategies need some kind of imbalance (from a game design perspective) in order to avoid stalemates and draw games to a conclusion. With this I do not mean that "I win" buttons are fine, just that lv9 spells being slightly over is not bad per se.
But with those options you have to play artificially short games, or play with few magic sites, etc. I guess I would just prefer to play the game where you can get to level 9 spells and have the game still be interesting and diverse.

And I agree that level 9 spells should be powerful, absolutely. It's just that there should be powerful spells available down all path and for all nations without forcing everyone down the same trajectory.

But this isn't the CBM thread, so I'll stop after this. Bottom line, I'd prefer to play CBM, but I'm not 100% averse to playing a vanilla game.

Last edited by Torgon; February 12th, 2012 at 12:51 PM..
Reply With Quote