[bbz]

OK so it is a question of definition. Do you preceive them as adjecent. Problem is Abyssia, and I had a Nap-3. Clause in the nap-3 all adjecent provinces to his capital are his. All adjecent provinces to my capital are mine. He did not mention 89 as a part of the provinces that are adjecent and thus I conquered it.(being owned by indipendents beforehand.) Now he blames me that I broke the nap clause. So I was wondering how is it preceived.( since most people know that there are quirks on the map and usually people preceive adjecent provinces, as provinces to which you have movement). So I was trying to clear that up for him, but he doesn't seem to want to listen.
Even Wiki defines Adjecent province as one at which you have movement and you can attack. (or heck type in google Dominions 3 adjecent province and see what comes up)

And regarding the meaning of adjecency I was asking in terms of a gameplay, or the way you understand it in this game. Since an agreement is in the bounds of the game, so all the parts of the agreements should be in the bounds of the game.