Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ebbesen
Okay. Let's start with the basics.
I don't have a right to post in this forum. You don't have a right to post in this forum. None of us do, save the Shrapnel staff. It is, effectively, a private club. And in a private club, you follow the rules regardless of whether you like them or not. Now, why is that, you ask?
Because I have entered a voluntary agreement, whereby in return for agreeing to follow the forum rules on this particular private forum (the price), I am extended the privilege of posting here (the benefit).
If I violate the forum rules consciously, then I violate my given word.
Which is something I will not do.
If I no longer wish to adhere to my side of the agreement or if I cannot in good conscience do so because I disagree with the rules, then I will no longer post in the forum.
This argument is good enough for me.
The question to you is then, given that you, too, have voluntarily entered this agreement, knowing full well what you agreed to as it was presented to you to read before joining and having all the time in the world to reread the agreement later on, why is obeying the forum rules not important to you?
|
So we agree, the rules are important as a social contact kept up by both sides. The contract should be know beforehand and followed by both sides. Like said before, shrapnel doesn't do this.
Shrapnel is not keeping up their side.
In the rules they say the don't like banning people. Well, apparently they do. They dislike giving out infractions more.
(Look, I have little problem with banning people when desired/deserved, just don't get all high and mighty about a large set of rules and don't follow them yourself. All this acting like you are the moral high ground).
Personally I prefer the organic ruleset. With exceptions, personal communication etc. Not this static high and might stuff.
But communication with people is hard. And doing the right thing for the dom3 community is not high on their priority list. Obviously.