View Single Post
  #20  
Old August 24th, 2012, 02:30 AM
FASTBOAT TOUGH's Avatar

FASTBOAT TOUGH FASTBOAT TOUGH is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 808
Thanked 1,367 Times in 1,023 Posts
FASTBOAT TOUGH is on a distinguished road
Fallout Re: mI-8 / mI-24 in German Service

Thank you both, concur on 122mm rockets for Mi-24. Agree Russia will fly with the heavier rockets and have reportedly used them in Chechnya. Russia also ordered 40 Mi-24M in May as part of their 2020 modernization plan. This is to include the ones already on hand that have been ordered and are flying within the last 2-3 years.
http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20110811/165710365.html
The Mi-24V/Mi-35M are interchangeable.

The MiG-29 issue is dead to me at this point as far as the Germanys are concerned. The only useful variant in the F/B version again was the MiG-29SM that for now it seems, only Russia flew. Interceptors are not good fighter bombers normally, as is already posted in this thread by the guys that flew them. The MiG-23 and it's dedicated full time mostly F/B offshoot the MiG-27 filled that role and were contemporaries to the MiG-29. In the first ref you'll notice the MiG-29A in Luftwaffe colors.
http://www.military-today.com/aircra...29_fulcrum.htm
http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/mig27/


I never argue with JANES, and of course I would find the refs that say 130mm rockets. Bottomline saved me a lot of wasted time over 8mm. So far the MiG-23 issue for East Germany looks good and they've already responed "next door" though I've seen some German info to suggust only the MiG-23BN might have been used as F/B and M versions as dediciated interceptors. Will get clarification. Seems the Soviets didn't trust them much for some roles as already pointed out concerning the SEAD issue. Kind of makes me wonder how many MiG-29 slots could be cut out of the Russian OOB.

Regards,
Pat
Reply With Quote