Quote:
Originally Posted by Pibwl
|
Didn't see any discrepancies. You spotted a few errors with the aircraft I didn't, and of course a huge number of armored car and truck related stuff I didn't pay any attention to. I actually set out to suggest increases in the light tank heavy MG AP values, since I remembered what Tony Williams had written about them, and also to correct the inflated off-map artillery ranges that seem to plague almost every OOB (probably because the pre-date the current standardization of off-map ranges). In the process I noticed some problems with the aircraft as well, which then became a major part of the post.
Only possible redundancy would be the Valentine III/V question. The Mk. III was used much longer like you wrote and the Mk. V even longer, but they had no differences which could be modeled in the game. So adding the Mk. V would be just for the sake of historical accuracy. Perhaps it would be better just to extend the dates of the Mk. III. One possibility would be to rename the unit "Valentine III/V" while extending the dates.
For Andy about the infantry personal weapons: I have to agree with Cross that changing them back to generic names would be a loss. Once you have them right they shouldn't require "maintenance", and they do add flavor.