[LGM]

I like the new way that Emissive Armor will work. Stacking would not be good, because it would take small ships out of the game. With it subtracting damage, even multiple ones are good because, when the first armor is gone, you still get emissive effect on later hits on the new emissive armor.

Think of Emissive Armor III being equal to 80, 110, 140, etc points of structural damage, depending on the opponents damage above 30kt. 80 KT is equal in ratio to Armor III, but costs a little more. However, if it takes 3 hits, it is equal to 140 KT which is much better than Armor III. This has made Emmissve armor potentially cost effective, depending on the damage an opponent can do.

Did they fix the problem emmissive armor has against units applying damage as a stack? If not, -30 damage is negligable against a stack of 50 fighters. Now if emissive armor did -30x50 against 50 units, then it would work good.

Also, as weapon mounts get bigger in the game, the -30 factor becomes less beneficial. I can see emissive armor being good against Standard and Large mounts, not Huge or Massive.

The game could use some weapons with real slow rates of fire that do truely massive damage. That might make small ships cost effective. Just like Torpedo boats. You would be willing to sacrifice a Frigate or Destroyer or Drone, if it could really hurt a Dreadnaught or Battleship.

[ August 13, 2002, 19:10: Message edited by: LGM ]