John,
As always thank you! And I still see you haven't lost your touch for the details.
Well three things come to my attention immediately...
1) In a sense my thought concerning the ammo was directed if you will, at the wrong ammo, that being said, I think you have something there about the
ATGM. And I believe this might be a true assessment.
2) I have to admit that I never gave much thought to "
experience" from the onset of the game of those tanks. This would explain
some of my earlier in game losses. These losses would be progressive throughout the game only getting marginally better as the campaign progresses due to the loss of the crews from the start. You're starting over every time with a new tank and crew.
That I should've seen, but didn't. And that's coming from the guy who's
constantly bringing it up when newer players are seeking help etc.
John thank you for reminding me!
3) Now after one test I believe we've found the leading "
culprit" the
ERA. So going back to the ref. I provided concerning the comparison between the
T-90A (
Russia "default" UNIT 860) and the
OPLOT-M (
UKRAINE "default" UNIT O64) that article pointed out that the ERA was in favor of the
OPLOT-M.
So is it possible to at least increase the ERA of the
OPLOT-M to achieve parody with the T-90A as in the game now? Or to give it the edge the article suggests? Some more perspective...
http://news.kievukraine.info/2018/06...on-worlds.html
I think it a fair one given where it's coming from and I'm seeing anything that "The National Review" ref from my last post didn't point out. Of note though from the above is the main gun comparison to it's Russian counterpart and the results of Malaysian tests between the base
T-84 versus the
T-90S which that the
T-84 was at
near parody with the
T-90S.
John thank you!
Regards,
Pat
