Here's my thinking concerning
BOXER FLW-100/200 (And investigating use of FLW-200 Plus w/Dual fed 20mm HE/AP mixed ammo load.)
GTK BOXER A0: Armed with early version
FLW-100 12.7mm
or 40mm/
GSR 40./SURVIBILITY
5
GTK BOXER A1: Armed with improved
FLW-100 same weapons/
GSR 45/SURVIBILITY 6 &
7. The
A1 when they
deployed to Afghanistan were fitted by KMW with "
belly armor" steel plate (
Not in the field.), which will mean
2 additional units, 4 total for the A1 version.
GTK BOXER A2: Armed with improved
FLW-200 and as noted above, the FLW-200 Plus./GSR 50/SURVIBILITY
7. Current
improved variant, based on "lessons learned" from the
BOXER AO/A1 previous deployments to Afghanistan.
1. I'm seeing the
addition of up to 6 more BOXERS.
2. There
will be date changes to the
right for the existing in game units outside of our
"Wag", for everyone else, that's
6 months when we have conflicting dates. That being said, these are
again driven by when the Training unit first got their FIRST one OR when the combat unit got their FIRST one.
3. I suspect there'll be
other modifications as well.
4. From the
BUNDESWEHR website, I'll be submitting around
3-5 new combat vehicles NOT currently in the OOB.
5. Some explanation in my last Posts in here on
BOXER, I felt that
GSR 60 was a legitimate number for the
FLW-200 weapon system. After some thought and just reaching a decision earlier today, I decided against it.
Why? Rightly or wrongly, that's because that's where our most
modern/newest tanks in or about to be in are currently in the game.
I might be corrected on this notion, but I generally see the newest
APC/IFV at (At their
upper limit #)
GSR 50/55 (w/ATGW).
HEAVY IFV GSR 55/60 these are normally your "tank killers" with same for all wheeled or tracked "tanks". AH Helos
GSR 70. This if you consider ALL aspects of the running game environment and internal operating systems (Mostly Game Code.)
6. I finally with this "
sign of life" would ask that
PLEASE DO NOT GET AHEAD OF ME ON THIS. I already know, I need to
modify the tanks as submitted in the last Patch.
7. This will almost or be in the same vain, be similar to
TURKEY, INDIA, MALAYSIA, INDONESIA AND USA/USMC in scope.
However
the big difference is at least
I knew it was coming. unlike above, it was more a matter of a piece(s) of equipment causing me to go down the
rabbit hole in the above countries i.e.
M1A1 FEP, LEOPARD 2T (DOA to ALTAY) etc.
All
legitimate issues
that however, all required "
looking back to look forward" I think most know what I mean here.
Time for my WALK!!!
Regards,
Pat
