I'm not going to deep into this next as the article(s) are pretty "
cut and dry". It's sourced from
British Intel on their assessment on Russian armor. The second from the
Pentagon.
You'll note there is no mention of the
T-14. The
T-14 has been unreliable (Even from Russian military sources.) and costs way too much.
Most of the production tanks are as you might expect, are the
T-90M Proryv and
T-72B3M tanks.
You have to keep in mind also, that the majority of their tank production capability is going towards various improvements of older tanks which they can get into the field quicker and cheaper than the new production ones as listed above.
https://www.armyrecognition.com/defe...ish_intel.html
I'll start with the following first:
"The Pentagon is currently
unable to provide the necessary spare parts or even assist Ukrainian personnel assigned to maintenance."
Secondly: You need to think about why we really haven't heard too much about the
M1A1 and the
LEOPARDS lately.
I am going to say, "I told you so." well into last year and before. The the key words were
Training, Logistics and Maintenace.
The
last 3 paras are all you need to read from the following and it covers all 3 of the above words. The German aspect at the end was really unexpected.
It's not at all good Ladies and Gentlemen.
https://www.armyrecognition.com/ukra...nian_army.html
Regards,
Pat
