View Single Post
  #1  
Old March 5th, 2024, 07:58 AM
MarkSheppard's Avatar

MarkSheppard MarkSheppard is offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,413
Thanks: 103
Thanked 648 Times in 432 Posts
MarkSheppard is on a distinguished road
Default Re: What happens in 2025? / new tactics- new technologies

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isto View Post
It can be as easy, than just coat the missile with a material, that either absorbs or mirrors the beam away in some way.
They give a specific power figure in the above article (4 kW/cm2) and a specific penetration figure at 10 km (quarter inch steel plate = 6.35mm)

The 122 mm OF-462 artillery shell has a wall thickness of about 17mm

LINK to drawing

60 to 80mm mortars have a wall thickness of about 12mm

81mm mortar drawing

60mm mortar drawing

A large commercial aircraft like the 747/Airbus/etc has about 2 to 4 mm skin thickness in aluminum; while ballistic missiles differ -- Titan II ICBM had a maximum skin thickness of 6~mm; while the Titan III Space Launch Vehicle went up to 12~mm to support heavier payloads on top.
Reply With Quote