View Single Post
  #9  
Old January 18th, 2001, 01:25 AM

Barnacle Bill Barnacle Bill is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Somewhere on the wine-dark sea...
Posts: 236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Barnacle Bill is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Satellites and the Need for Fighters at Games Start

quote:
Originally posted by God Emperor:
Dont outlaw it, lets include a logical counter.
In a future space combat encounter, I could imagine someone seeding satellites around an enemy planet if they thought it would work.




In Science Fiction you are dealing with something that hasn't happened yet. How it will work is conjecture, based on your assumptions as to the course of future technological developments. Sometimes authors make assumptions and then decide how combat would work based on them. More often, they adopt a paradigm based on some historical model and tailor the assumptions to make it work. For example, in Weber's Honor Harrinton stories he wanted it to work like naval combat in the age of sail, so he invented tech that makes it do so. Throwing in an aircraft carrier analog mucks it all up, if what you want is Trafalgar in space. If what you want is Midway in space, that's another story.

Offensive use of satellites does not fit the paradigm that it appears MM was seeking, which looks like what mainstream naval theorists expected in the late 1930's (battlewagons still rule the waves but carriers or at least aircraft have a significant supporting role). So, I support killing the concept altogether.
Reply With Quote