|
|
|
|
September 15th, 2003, 02:28 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Energy vs Ballistic weapons...
I am really at a loss here. I'm just learning how to play se4g. I'm researching energy weapons now, stream and otherwise, but they seem to be much much weaker than the ballistic weapons, depleted uranium cannons. Anyone know what the benefit of using these weapons is? They don't seem to use less supply, cost less, or weigh less at all, so what would be the point when you have much better weapons.
|
September 15th, 2003, 02:32 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Energy vs Ballistic weapons...
Keep researching. Any energy weapon will eventually make DUCs look pretty pathetic.
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
September 15th, 2003, 02:36 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Energy vs Ballistic weapons...
Projectile weapons are sort of a technological dead end - sure, they're powerful and cheap, but you can only research them so far. A Depleted Uranium Cannon V does 40 damage at range 5; compare that with more advanced weapons like Antiproton Beams (50-60 damage at range 8) and Phased Polaron Beams (50-60 shield skipping damage at range 6). Sure, it takes a long time to get to the highest levels of those other weapons, but the fact is they're there and they're reachable, so anyone who doesn't research projectile weapons is probably that much ahead of you toward the other ones!
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|
September 15th, 2003, 09:31 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Energy vs Ballistic weapons...
hi, welcome to the forums. do you want some cheese? how about toast?
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
September 15th, 2003, 11:15 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Energy vs Ballistic weapons...
Also, at the lower end of the techtree, meson bLasters give a much higher damage/weight/reload ratio than DUCs, torps or just about anything. (they're only 20kt remember.)
And thanks for the offer Narf. Any chance of some cheese on toast?
[ September 15, 2003, 10:16: Message edited by: dogscoff ]
|
September 15th, 2003, 12:22 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 15,630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Energy vs Ballistic weapons...
Phased Poloron Beams are AI killers. DUC's combined with mounts, oh yes - must use mounts, and other components are quite useful against human players in most PBW games.
Mounts will increase the range or power of a weapon. Be sure to check them out.
__________________
Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|