|
|
|
|
September 25th, 2003, 05:49 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Depopulation
One thing I've often wondered about in Dom I (and whether it might be different in II) is the issue of depopulation. I never participated in a long pbem, but I'd expect that by the end, players are fighting over a nearly dead world. There are an awful lot of ways to kill off the local populace when you consider pillaging, Murdering Winter, patrolling for $, Ermor's dominion, etc.
So a question for the vets: did the world start feeling empty towards the end of a long game, and how did you feel about it, if so?
|
September 25th, 2003, 06:03 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Depopulation
I would like to see more spells focusing in augmenting the population of a province locally (you can do it with Gift of Nature's Bounty, but it's a global enchantment).
Also, if raising taxes lower the population, low taxes should do the inverse.
|
September 25th, 2003, 06:14 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: Depopulation
Depopulation was mostly a problem if Ermor was one of the nations in a game. I have seen many games where players crank up their growth scale to get increased populations in their home provinces.
The dominion of Ermor is no longer destructive by deafault, but there is a destructive pangaean theme, so provinces left barren are probably about as common as before.
Slightly off topic:
Population might decrease due to high taxes in Dom II.
To reduce micromanagement patrolling, taxes and the order scale have been remade. The order scale now directly effects the income. High taxes and successful patrolling reduces population making high taxes a short term policy and not something every player must master to stand a chance of winning a game.
High tax - patrolling was tedious and unbalancing. Only vets with high ambitions of winning could stomach the micromanagement issues of patrolling.
Now high taxes are a short time measure. We hope that this is a good solution.
|
September 25th, 2003, 06:19 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nuts-Land, counting them.
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Depopulation
nice issue to raise Truper. It is true that in doms I you have many population killing spells, but few (one, a global) which do the reverse. I wonder if doms II is a bit more gentle with the poor farmers and workers... I like to be able to reverse a process (is it akin to the fear of death, doctor?). In doms I for example, if you 'liberate' the wasteland which constitute Ermor, you are left with a barren land, without hope of any reconstruction, and despite a growth +3 factor (because the growth is a % bonus of increase, and dont give you a base increase of say 300 pop a turn). Whats more its even stranger when you read your dominions description : it is written that the lush of nature can be seen everywhere, and that harvest is done 4 times a year, but ... nobody live here!
to answer more specifically your question, in dominions I, with growth +3, you can raise your population slowly.
Treebeard : in doms II patrolling wont allow you to increase taxes, if I recall. In fact I dont think there is a tax % to be modified.
__________________
Currently playing: Dominions III, Civilization IV, Ageod American Civil War.
|
September 25th, 2003, 06:20 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nuts-Land, counting them.
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Depopulation
Kristoffer replied while I was typing... so the Last part of my post is obsolete.
__________________
Currently playing: Dominions III, Civilization IV, Ageod American Civil War.
|
September 25th, 2003, 06:54 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 883
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Depopulation
Quote:
Originally posted by Pocus:
nice issue to raise Truper. It is true that in doms I you have many population killing spells, but few (one, a global) which do the reverse. I wonder if doms II is a bit more gentle with the poor farmers and workers... I like to be able to reverse a process (is it akin to the fear of death, doctor?). In doms I for example, if you 'liberate' the wasteland which constitute Ermor, you are left with a barren land, without hope of any reconstruction, and despite a growth +3 factor (because the growth is a % bonus of increase, and dont give you a base increase of say 300 pop a turn). Whats more its even stranger when you read your dominions description : it is written that the lush of nature can be seen everywhere, and that harvest is done 4 times a year, but ... nobody live here!
to answer more specifically your question, in dominions I, with growth +3, you can raise your population slowly.
Treebeard : in doms II patrolling wont allow you to increase taxes, if I recall. In fact I dont think there is a tax % to be modified.
|
We like it the way it is, it is easier to kill than to repopulate. If you kill off a whole province it only makes sense that it is a very slow process for it to be repopulated.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|