|
|
|
|
November 24th, 2005, 04:23 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 995
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
OT: Having fun with pictures
One of my friends runs a little market stall, selling various things that she imports from Brazil, and she's asked me to do up a little website for her. Of course, since a considerable bulk of her business is in lingerie, I agreed, provided my payment involved dinner with at least one of the models.
Anyway, I've got all the pictures for the website, which were sent to me direct from a digital camera, which means they're really big and about 1MB per jpg, which isn't exactly a web-friendly format.
So, I'm wondering if anyone knows of some sort of batch coversion software that can resize the images for me, since going through all 604 manually might actually kill me. Heart strain on this project overall is going to be a worry, actually. And then when I need to make thumbnails, it'll be a tad easier as well.
__________________
Suction feet are not to be trifled with!
|
November 24th, 2005, 05:40 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
Irfanview has batch conversion available.
Should be quite easy to use it to scale your pictures to whatever size you need.
__________________
Things you want:
|
November 24th, 2005, 06:52 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,227
Thanks: 7
Thanked 44 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
Although it might be a pain to do them individually, Digital cam .jpg images tend to have some serious artifacting. I would take the time to load, remove .jpg 'noise', resize to a common height (maintaining the original proportions) and resave in a no-loss format like .bmp or .png. then do any post production that needs to be done and resave as .jpg with a 1x1x1 sample compression. (Most default .jpg is 2x2x2 sample compression which has a greater amount of artifacting.)
Anyways. Any job worth doing is worth doing well, and gee, hundreds of girls in lingerie that's got to be one tough decision,.. blind batch processing or one at a time to ensure (and aprieciate) the quality of the girls,..(I mean photos)
Nuf said, Cheers!
|
November 24th, 2005, 07:17 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
Of course you could always ask for volunteers to assist you with your project. I'm sure you could find a few helpful types willing to assist you with your heavy burden.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
November 24th, 2005, 08:33 PM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
You know, I had a similiarly sleazy response as DEG and Geo all typed up before there were any responses in this thread , but I said to myself: Nope; I'm not gonna do it. I knew it would happen, though.
__________________
Slick.
|
November 25th, 2005, 05:05 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
I use Directory Opus ( here ) in place of Windows Explorer. It has a batch conversion option for images, allowing you to set filetype and size. Works quite well.
__________________
Quack?
|
November 25th, 2005, 12:04 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outter Glazbox
Posts: 760
Thanks: 12
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
Quote:
David E. Gervais said:
Although it might be a pain to do them individually, Digital cam .jpg images tend to have some serious artifacting. I would take the time to load, remove .jpg 'noise', resize to a common height (maintaining the original proportions) and resave in a no-loss format like .bmp or .png. then do any post production that needs to be done and resave as .jpg with a 1x1x1 sample compression. (Most default .jpg is 2x2x2 sample compression which has a greater amount of artifacting.)
Anyways. Any job worth doing is worth doing well, and gee, hundreds of girls in lingerie that's got to be one tough decision,.. blind batch processing or one at a time to ensure (and aprieciate) the quality of the girls,..(I mean photos)
Nuf said, Cheers!
|
David is right. I had some CAD files I tried to convert in a batch program. While the program did convert the files, afterward I had to go in manually and touch them all up. Sometime that's why they call it WORK. If you enjoy what your doing then it won't seem like work at all. UNLESS you don't enjoy looking at girls in lingerie!!
|
November 26th, 2005, 08:13 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
Cleaning up noise is a one by one operation, but resizing (assuming you just want the originals all downscaled directly without any cropping) and converting file formats are all batch operations. Doing those parts one by one is pretty silly IMO. Any noise created by conversion would have to be cleaned up one by one either way, and for reduced size web site pics it probably won't be that noticeable. Just make sure to save lossless (PNG) copies before the conversion to smaller jpgs as David suggests.
Photoshop and The GIMP (free) support batch processing, and I believe that Paintshop Pro might as well.
|
November 27th, 2005, 02:20 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 995
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
Out of curiousity, if I asked for volunteers to help me out with this, how many would I get?
__________________
Suction feet are not to be trifled with!
|
November 27th, 2005, 08:28 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,066
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Having fun with pictures
You could do the bulk of the resizizing with Photoshop. There's a macro recorder in there somewhere you can use to apply the same settings to multiple files. I used it to change the color of the Cheaters race so they were gold instead of the Default silver.
I don't remember where it is, but I found it with the Photoshop help file. Afterwards you can do the less-repetitive retouching file by file.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|