|
|
|
 |

September 26th, 2005, 12:22 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Forts and Resources
Say we have 3 provinces that are adjacent to each other (A, B and C). A and B have castles with 40% admin.
I believe A and B will suck 40% of the resources from C. But will A and B draw 40% of the resources from each other?
|

September 26th, 2005, 12:57 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Forts and Resources
i believe so and that is really the only reason not to just castle spam if you have the gold (though often i do anyway)
|

September 26th, 2005, 01:31 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Forts and Resources
No. But the castle in B will keep A from drawing from it, likewise B won't be able to draw from A. Not such a big deal if they're both plains with very little resources and each drawing from high resource neighbors, since each could take 40% from, for instance, mountains in C.
A third castle that also bordered C would cause a problem though, as they can't get 120% of C's resources.
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

September 26th, 2005, 02:19 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Forts and Resources
We have a conflict, but I'm gonna go with Cainehill here, since he seems more definite about it
Thanks for the replies.
|

September 28th, 2005, 06:24 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Forts and Resources
Cainehill is right, provinces with forts are immune to administrative resource drain.
Edi
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|