POLL - Should we use a reduced Core Force?
After you examine the sample campaign for the use of the "multiple choices support assets", you should have a first feeling for the size of the CORE FORCE.
So far, Davide and I have the feeling that this CORE FORCE may be a little bigger than actually needed.
If we assume that during the 7-8 ToOs the player is going to play 6-8 missions per ToO, then the player is going to play aproximatelly 56 battles!!!
So given the number of battles there is a big risk that the player will become tired if he has to manage a very big Core Force.
So my question is:
After you play the sample campaign and experience the size of the core force, do you think that we should reduce everything by 30% ?
In other words the new reduced (-30%) Core Force will become:
***Core Forces reduced by 30%***
1. 2x AirCAv Platoon(M) (6x)
2. 4x Patrol (3x)
3. 4x Mg section (1x)
4. 2x Snipers (1x)
5. 2x Pioneer platoon (2x)(bunker-busting unit)
6. 2x Forward Obs (1x)(one for each platoon)
7. 2x Mortar sections (2x)
This will give a TOTAL of 41 units for the CORE FORCE (instead of the 57).
So, what do you think?
Should we use a reduced CORE FORCE by 30%
cheers,
Pyros
|