|
|
|
View Poll Results: Trading commanders is an exploit?
|
Yes
|
  
|
5 |
10.64% |
No
|
  
|
42 |
89.36% |

January 29th, 2010, 04:36 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Trading commanders, exploit or not?
Micah was really clear, I think. Sending attacks that have no chance of doing any harm. It's really obvious.
When you are about to storm any fort, he can just cast some remote-attack spells, so your mages execute the script meant for storming. And there is nothing you can do about it. And you can't do the same to your enemy, as he is in the fort. Good luck winning without BEs or buffs.
Sure, it's sometimes hard to decide when you want to really weaken someone before storming and when you want to burn his gems. But many situations are obvious. You don't send GRs to kill few chaff units. You don't send one weakly equipped thug to attack 30+ mages, without even scripting it.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|