|
|
|

July 16th, 2011, 02:25 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: rules question: turn resolution
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonBrave
Excuse me for saying the bleedin' obvious, then, but if Mr (or Ms) Pyrrhic could find just one caster with a lower ID than the opponent he could be sure to "surround" him?
|
No can do. The target in question is a bunch of Benim with ID 106. As I said in the OP, lower than any of my casters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonBrave
As for "It's essentially random.", randomness is a bit of a hobby of mine, here the overall order is not at all random, though I suppose it is for the purpose of which direction it goes  Assuming that thejeff is correct (and I would not doubt it!), if that is the definition of the manual's "in a random order", I wouldn't go basing an encryption algorithm on it 
|
I think the fine point here is the difference between in random order and in a random order. And what do you have against 1-bit encryption? 
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|