|
|
|
 |

June 24th, 2004, 07:31 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Proposition: Zen vs. Norfleet
Quote:
It's hard to tell whether Zen actually believes what he says, or whether he's required to be their loyal stooge under the terms of his employment contract.
|
Takes a lot to make me actually lol when reading forums... and I thought only I noticed
All in good fun Zen
|

June 24th, 2004, 07:33 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition: Zen vs. Norfleet
Well, the entire "we own your soul" thing tends to be standard boilerplate when dealing with companies. I used to believe Illwinter was different, but now I see there's no real evidence to support that.
|

June 24th, 2004, 08:09 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition: Zen vs. Norfleet
Quote:
Well, the entire "we own your soul" thing tends to be standard boilerplate when dealing with companies. I used to believe Illwinter was different, but now I see there's no real evidence to support that.
|
Nooo .... that sounds bitter and you are too cool to be bitter! Say it ain't so!
|

June 24th, 2004, 08:33 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition: Zen vs. Norfleet
Quote:
Originally posted by Huzurdaddi:
Nooo .... that sounds bitter and you are too cool to be bitter! Say it ain't so!
|
I'm not too cool to be bitter. I make being bitter cool.
Frankly, I've always been this way. I just thought Illwinter was different. Turns out they're not, to no great surprise. Hey, if it sounds like a rat, and smells like a rat, go figure.
Personally, I'd have been happy to let this thing DIE, but SOMEBODY *glares at Torlin* had to dig this thing back up.
[ June 24, 2004, 07:36: Message edited by: Norfleet ]
|

June 25th, 2004, 01:36 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition: Zen vs. Norfleet
Leave it to the newb, Norfleet, we'll surprise and annoy you every single time.
Anyway, I'm just looking to be a better player, so I thought this idea would be a great learning experience! I'm really not tryig to stir up a hornets nest all over again.
With that said, I'll drop it now and let both of you continue on with your religeous purges.
*secrectly hopes the two purges wind up smacking straight into each each other in the middle of the chaos wastes, prompting all out war and the inevitable destruction of one of the most powerful beings here*

__________________
Superior Thinking has always Overwhelmed Superior Force.
~USMC
|

June 24th, 2004, 02:41 PM
|
|
Re: Proposition: Zen vs. Norfleet
Actually I don't back IW on every conceivable thing that they say. Because as we all know, everyone is human and can potentially make mistakes. What I do back is the fact that this game, which these forums are for, is singular in the fact that it provides so much more than most other games of it's genre and it has evolved from it's release to now to a much better game, no matter whatever biased opinion that certain players feel because they consistantly have problems with anything being changed from it's original form and take the MMO mentality of everything is a "Nerf" and nothing is an upgrade.
I do however, totally and unflinchingly back the proper context which thoughts and ideas are delivered *to* the Developers if you wish to initiate change. And it is there that most of the conflict arises where I must "back Illwinter".
[ June 24, 2004, 13:44: Message edited by: Zen ]
|

June 24th, 2004, 03:43 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: twilight zone
Posts: 2,247
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proposition: Zen vs. Norfleet
Quote:
Originally posted by Zen:
the MMO mentality of everything is a "Nerf" and nothing is an upgrade
|
Having played the E&B and SWG MMOs, I can assure you that the majority of the nerfs those games suffered through, during and post-beta, did not improve the game, nor were they felt as "upgrades" by 99% of the players. I can only recall a handful of nerfs that actually worked well to improve game balance. The rest simply lessened (drastically) the enjoyment of the game for those players with characters directly affected by them.
So far, IW does not appear to have gone hog-wild with the same sort of nerfing as I experienced in those games (which is the reason I quit SWG), but the trend that I'm seeing is disturbing. I'm a firm believer in the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" philosophy, and several of the nerfs from 2.08 onwards fall into the "we jacked with it because we felt like it" Category, rather than because there was any pressing need to fix some problem being reported by a majority of players. There are real, serious, longstanding bugs in Dom2 that have yet to be fixed while IW devotes its attention to silencing the whining of a very vocal and tiny percentage of its customers, many of which are grossly challenged in the strategic-thinking department and should go back to playing the mindless twitch games that they're suited for.
If a game is less fun after a patch than before, then that patch's nerfs are counterproductive. E&B and SWG (especially SWG) failed that test miserably. After all, people play games to have fun, and not to just fatten the bank accounts of the companies running the games. So far, I cannot say that about Dom 2, but as I said, the trend is disturbing.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|