Encyclopedia Malfadorica (Wiki)

Suicide Junkie · #1 October 28th, 2002, 09:04 PM

How about [mod list] instead? Shorter, and easier to remember / type exactly.

geoschmo · #2 October 28th, 2002, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
How about [mod list] instead? Shorter, and easier to remember / type exactly.

I like it. One article with a list of all known mods, organized into the four type Groups.

Geoschmo

Ed Kolis · #3 October 29th, 2002, 02:54 AM

This thing is damn addictive - I started writing an hour ago and still I've got things to cover! Every time I read or write a new entry it opens up 3 more things to write about!

geoschmo · #4 October 29th, 2002, 03:31 AM

Ed, you are doing a great job. Everybody is. I think this is going to be an amazing resource.

One thing though Ed. Please don't take this as a critisism. But you have added a couple pages that were already there. Boarding Parties, there was already a Boarding Party. Malfador, when there was already a page for Malfador Machinations. You can do a search for exsisting pages. Sometimes the page is there and we just need to modify our link to pick it up. You can put [Malfador|Malfador Machinations] For example, or [Boarding Parties|Boarding Party] to link an alternate spelling to an exsisting page.

Geoschmo

TerranC · #5 October 29th, 2002, 04:14 AM

heh. So many plugs, so many errors

.

I believe that Abbreviations were to be left out? or can we go crazy?

geoschmo · #6 October 29th, 2002, 04:41 AM

Terran, I don't know. I thought we were trying to avoid separate articles just for abbreveations, or plurals or alternate spellings. But with all the people working on it maybe absolute consistancy is impossible. I certainly don't want to come off as the Encyclopdedia police or anything.

Geoschmo

Skulky · #7 October 29th, 2002, 07:36 AM

The FQM/FTL error was mine, signed as chocolatefro, so sorry, i thought i knew what i was talking about, but i didn't. But i'm sure you've fixed it so its all good right?

EDIT: I didn't want to take the liberty of doing this so, Laz, can we have a strategies page on the first page too? This seems to be a hot topic around here, however is it too divergent from teh focus of the encyclopedia? I think its fine but your call.

[ October 29, 2002, 05:39: Message edited by: Skulky ]