|
|
|
|
|
August 9th, 2010, 04:11 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
As to EdKolis' tech tree uncertanty - The only way that I could see this as being important is if it changes with each game. Otherwise, after the first play, we will know what is required to get the next discovery (whether they are called levels or not, it appears to come to the same result).
I think it would be cool to have a tech tree that is different each time we play - some races find certain discoveries easier than others in the play of a game. Might make for interesting tech trading or espionage opportunites.
There was a paper and pencil game back in the 70s or 80s that had a randomization factor in the results. Sometimes you would get a specific tech for your efforts, and sometimes you get the shaft.
|
August 9th, 2010, 09:28 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: iola, ks, usa
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
Perhaps if the multiplier is randomized. For example, your low/medium/high tech cost games have multipliers of 1, 2, and 4 to your "base" tech costs. Instead, make them a random number within a range. An example would be 0.80-1.20, 1.60-2.40, and 3.40-4.60. Then if I chose a low tech game, the computer picks a random number (1.12) and all your base costs are multiplied by 1.12 THIS time. The next time you play a low tech cost game, the random multiplier might be 0.94, and research would progress a little more than one sixth faster than it did the first game.
Lets look at another example: a high tech cost game. The first game could have a random multiplier of 3.53, and the second could be 4.51. In that example, tech gains in the second game would come about 1/3 slower than in the first game.
I would suggest making those randomization ranges moddable, as well.
|
August 10th, 2010, 10:17 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanbeke
As to EdKolis' tech tree uncertanty - The only way that I could see this as being important is if it changes with each game. Otherwise, after the first play, we will know what is required to get the next discovery (whether they are called levels or not, it appears to come to the same result).
I think it would be cool to have a tech tree that is different each time we play - some races find certain discoveries easier than others in the play of a game. Might make for interesting tech trading or espionage opportunites.
There was a paper and pencil game back in the 70s or 80s that had a randomization factor in the results. Sometimes you would get a specific tech for your efforts, and sometimes you get the shaft.
|
While I agree it still leaves a tech tree you know at least early game it makes the choices more dependant on the current situation. Go for the quick fix upgrade route or take the more cost effective probably next tech leap.
I agree everybody should be able to research a techs basics but the further along you go the more chance it should have to diversify or just plain fail like real life. Gave some ways to diversify the tech tree before stoping the boredom of same old tactics.
Tech trading & certainly pilfering could have 2 levels, learn the tech or get a boost in time & success for reverse engineering when you get your mitts on one. Getting your hands on a tech way in advance of where you are there should be a good chance you cant figure it out till further along even if you got the plans. Building a car would be a chalenge if you just invented the wheel after all we havent figured out the anti gravity drive from the Roswell crash yet
__________________
John
|
August 16th, 2010, 06:16 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
I would love the option to scale up into huge arenas - I do like the longer games too.
I would love to see some sort of leader system. Not like MOO2, more like Hearts of Iron.
Basically just a database of names and they are assigned to every division built, every ship etc. Each leader has some form of Skill, experience and Rank. Same as ship experience each captain can gain until he reaches next level(skill increase) or if you chose to promote him, trade it in for Rank (Higher Rank means they can control more units, Captain controls 1 ship, whereas an admiral can control 30 ships for example, exceeding it would be detrimental).
The Skill could be used for a combat modifier (especially in autoresolving). On creating fleets and auto-assigning available personnel, it may be worth promoting an experienced captain, maybe I have a favourite heh. I think this adds very much to flavour, we can leave it to do its own thing but we can delve into it to tinker with some of the whos-who in your army/navy.
Furthermore, possibilities of extending this go into news/flavour reports naming the individuals, or events - for example royalty of your empire joining the navy forcing you to not needlessly expend that fleet in your next foolish venture. If you have a leader Rank = maximum number of ships controlled value then tech options to expand this number become a bit more desirable (ship datalink/neural links techs etc). Surrender may require you to hand over specific admirals etc etc
..maybe getting a wee bit too much now for something already in production but the base idea alone would add some nice flavour.
|
August 18th, 2010, 04:12 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,066
Thanks: 109
Thanked 162 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
Do you mean scaling up as in Spore? That sounded like a really interesting idea, but I never actually played the game.
|
August 23rd, 2010, 10:48 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
If it was my comment your referring to Gregstrom, I was thinking more along the lines of having the option to play on a huge map, or a wee map.
But then a couple days ago I stumbled across Aurora, and i'm blown away by just how amazingly detailed it is. It been described as the Dwarf Fortress of 4x and its true i'm loving it so far. Its incredibly difficult to get to grips with but persevering is paying off, if you haven't heard of it then i highly suggest you take a look.
In Aurora it seems you can scale up the map as you go along, spawn new enemies and increase the map size on the go. It seems to work well with that and its an option i hadn't really considered myself.
I think that to have scaling up you would be better off in a SE/Starfire/Aurora method of space travel - systems linked by warp points and all interstellar travel is via these, I'm not sure if this is the road your taking (or something along the lines of lost empires/Distant worlds that simulates the entire galaxy and you travel by more conventional means, you see all the stars at the start and you can get there (eventually).
I'd prefer the SE way tbh, also id prefer that we don't get to see what links where and all the systems laid out on the map at the start etc - adds to the sense of exploration - I could go on but probably it's better in a seperate post).
Banging on again about the officers post I made above, Aurora also has a well developed officer system (very much as I suggested above, only with the additions of traits and bonuses, also Officer roles for civilian, army, navy and special project teams (not quite sure what they do yet).
The thing that stands out the most tho is your promoting or watching getting promoted) officers and governers of your own race, unlike the very similar moo system where its a mash of weird races turning up on your doorstep offering their services (its so deep he even has a political system in there to simulate useless officers with good political contacts getting promoted above better officers without the political clout).
|
August 23rd, 2010, 05:58 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: iola, ks, usa
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
Ah, Aurora. Have you tried uninstalling it yet? Here's a hint: you can't. At least, not by any method _I_ can find...
|
August 24th, 2010, 09:01 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dumbluck
Ah, Aurora. Have you tried uninstalling it yet? Here's a hint: you can't. At least, not by any method _I_ can find...
|
Off topic but do you mean install data got corrupted so it does not show up in control panel programes & features?
If so & you have an aftermarket program to keep your system running efficently try it they are often better than what comes as standard. Try cleaning the registery first if it does not show.
Otherwise do the following
1) Use a registery cleaner CCleaner is quick & free so download & clean the registry.
2) Use windows explorer or whatever you use & navigate to the folder you installed it in, delete it & all its contents.
Check first if it looks like it saves games in there if not or unsure also go to the following & check for.
C:\Users\Default\Saved Game & the same for your user name i.e.
C:\Users\USER NAME(S)\Saved Game
3) Delete any shortcuts to in start menu or icon on your desktop.
4) Now clean the registry again.
Note when you clean the registry always keep doing till it finds nothing clearing stuff on the first pass often uncovers more errors.
Thats it there might be a couple of librays left on your system but no need to worry.
Whenever you uninstall anything you should always at the minimum check its folder & shortcuts are gone & then clean the registry most stuff does not uninstall fully.
__________________
John
|
August 30th, 2010, 10:21 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outter Glazbox
Posts: 760
Thanks: 12
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
That's the best way to do it Imp!
Some Virus programs come with an uninstaller too! You can try using that.
|
August 30th, 2010, 03:40 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,066
Thanks: 109
Thanked 162 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Re: High level design thoughts
Is trolling really necessary?
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|