|
|
|
|
|
May 17th, 2009, 09:06 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 883
Thanks: 14
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
So basically the problem is that everyone is counting on other people fighting while they'd be left in peace, and then conquering the ruins.
Mexican standoff of a kind, resulting in a win by endurance.
|
May 17th, 2009, 09:47 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
It's true, if no-one intends to fight, the game has ended in a stalemate.
I'm inclined to say that this doesn't = victory for QM/Micah, though, as if they tried to conquer the world I'm not at all convinced they could do it.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
May 17th, 2009, 12:44 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
Ok, so I think that declaring the game finished with a draw will be best then. Does it sound right?
I think it will be better to tweak the map, and mod removing gem-gens and start 2nd edition.
|
May 17th, 2009, 02:31 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
also, non-insane victory conditions are good
|
May 17th, 2009, 02:37 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
Here were not insane, I think. 12/26 VPs to win.
|
May 17th, 2009, 04:17 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
You know, here I'd completely forgotten the actual victory conditions. I'd think that QM/Micah could jump that many VP pretty easily, actually.
So I'd be willing to concede on that point, but I still think VP accumulation works better. How many VP would QM/Micah have accumulated by now? Like 50 or something?
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
May 17th, 2009, 04:21 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
Accumulated VPs don't work though really. At least not that in-game ones. You get 1 every mid-summer month for controlling VP.
|
May 17th, 2009, 04:22 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
why don't you guys play for a few more turns, have micah and qm show their stuff, and see how it lies after the dust clears? It should be pretty clear whether or not they have a bead on some ineluctable march to victory.
otherwise, end it as a draw, as surely all the participants aren't conceding.
|
May 17th, 2009, 11:39 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
Works for me, although 12 VP between them shouldn't be hard to reach.
As for VP accumulation not working - that's exactly how VP accumulation is *supposed* to work, you get 1 VP / VP province / summer.
I find that requiring twice the VP on the map (that'd be about 50 in this case), causes games to end in this very late stage, so you get to see the end game but it doesn't drag on intermeniably. YMMV.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
May 19th, 2009, 07:04 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
I just got a new turn file .... so that's the plan, then? Caelum is going for the win or are Micah/QM not playing any more either? Can we set anyone who stales this turn to be AI?
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|