.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 27th, 2000, 11:07 PM
LintMan's Avatar

LintMan LintMan is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 295
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
LintMan is on a distinguished road
Default Some thoughts on mines and mine sweepers

It seems right now that mines are a bit unbalanced, especially vs. the AI.

The biggest part of the problem as I see it is that mine sweepers are so fragile/ineffective: If there are more mines than a sweeper can handle in a turn, it gets destroyed by the rest of the mines. So in an otherwise unguarded sector with a 100-200 mines, you need lots of sweeper ships, with multiple sweeper components, at a fairly high tech level, in order not to lose all your sweepers in the process of clearing the mines. And since it's impossible to detect the number of mines in a sector, you can only guess how many sweepers will be needed, and if you're wrong, there goes your whole sweeper fleet.

You can create badass minefields just by getting minefield tech level 1 (and the fairly cheap explosives techs), but to clear the mines with any efficiency, you need to get all the way up to mine tech level 5, which is godawful expensive. (I think level 3 alone costs 400K RP).

The first part of my suggestion is that instead of mines automatically damaging any ships entering the sector, there could be a percentage chance that any given ship moving through the sector will be hit by mines. (If a ship was hit, it would take damage from all the mines until it is destroyed or there are no mines left). The percentage would be fairly small if there was only one mine in the sector, but would rapidly increase as more mines were added, and max out at, say, 95% chance with 200+ mines in the sector. This would always give ships a chance to make it through and make minefields less of a certainty on sealing off borders.

Further, I would make mines more detectable, say by level 1 scanners at first, but then at higher mine tech levels, new mine components would let mines go up to level 5 undetectability. A ship with sufficient scanner levels would be able to pass through the minefield with a reduced chance of detonating any mines (say, half the normal likelihood of triggering the mines).

The other part of my suggestion is that mine sweepers should be relatively "immune" to triggering the mines - say, only 1/5 the normal chance of detonating them. (Think of the wooden-hulled boats the US Navy uses as mine sweepers). So you could send a sweeper into the minefield, and it could gradually over a number of turns clear the field, clearing however many it can per turn.

So if you don't want your enemy clearing your minefields, you'd need to back it up with some satellites or a base or some ships to take out the sweepers.

To prevent getting cheap mine immunity by just throwing a single sweeper component on every ship in a fleet...
- A special mine sweeper hull could be required to get the immunity (again, think of wooden-hulled sweeper ships today)
...or...
- The sweeper component could be made large, say 200K (but it does 5x-6x the # of mines), so it's too big to want to put one on every ship in a fleet. Or it could be a separate, bulky component (gotten from the mine tech tree) that provides the mine immunity that would also be necessary in addition to the sweeper components.
...or...
- Make it so only ships with the mine sweeper Category get the immunity, and they would need to have 50-75% of their space as sweepers.

It seems to me that changes like this would balance out mines a bit while still leaving them as an effective defense, but it would also give the AI a better chance to deal with them since it wouldn't have to build up a huge "sweeper-fleet" just to take out those massive mine fields human players like to build.

What do you guys think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 28th, 2000, 01:03 AM

Baron Munchausen Baron Munchausen is offline
General
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Baron Munchausen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Some thoughts on mines and mine sweepers

Very good, Lintman! This is such a close duplication of a post that I made to the beta forum a couple days ago that I wonder if you read it. I hope that beta testers and regular customers expressing the same thing about mines will finally convince MM to modify them just a teeny bit! The one major observation which I made that you didn't is that the "economics" of mines are flat. It's smarter to use small mines because several small mines will destroy a large ship, but a single large mine is wasted on a small ship. So it's more effective and efficient to use the small mine forever, no matter how far up the tech field you go, because mines start out at maximum effectiveness unlike any other technology. We need to change that by just such measures as you have described: Limited cloaking ability for early mines, and a sliding scale of effectiveness for mine-sweepers according to the relative tech level of the sweeper and the mines.

[This message has been edited by Baron Munchausen (edited 27 November 2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 28th, 2000, 01:40 AM
LintMan's Avatar

LintMan LintMan is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 295
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
LintMan is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Some thoughts on mines and mine sweepers

LOL! That's funny!

No, I hadn't seen your post; I'm not a beta tester so I can't access those forums. I'd love to see it, though.

I'm glad someone agrees with me at least!

I didn't mention it below, but I actually did notice that the small mines were more economical. That was one of the reasons I suggested adding new mine components that would decrease mine's detectability (rather than just different mine types that were less detectable)- It would encourage going up to larger mine sizes to be able to fit that extra stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 28th, 2000, 02:54 AM

Elmo Elmo is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Elmo is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Some thoughts on mines and mine sweepers

A friend and I suggested to MM that mines were too powerful. However I believe they feel that mines are OK as they are, so we just tweaked the files as a quick fix. A small mine now only holds one warhead in our game and we doubled the sweeper component capacity to sweep mines at each tech level. Instead of sweeping 1-2-3-4-5 mines the components now sweep 2-4-6-8-10 at each level. I agree that sensors should be able to detect mines in some fashion and it shouldn't be that hard to implement.

Elmo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 28th, 2000, 05:49 AM

Baron Munchausen Baron Munchausen is offline
General
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Baron Munchausen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Some thoughts on mines and mine sweepers

Elmo:

Yes, I have done the exact same modification on Mine Sweepers in my custom techs. This helps some, but the different relative effectiveness against different tech levels of mines cannot be achieved with available game abilities. I hope that we will see some sort of additional flexibility on mines in the future, but many players like the 'certainty' of mines as a defense and it will probably have to be something small and settable so they can keep their infallible mines that can turn a system into a closed fortress.

I've been thinking about how to implement varying levels of mine stealth in the techs. A "cloaking device" for mines would require supplies to be consistent with the ship Version. If you extended "stealth" armor to be more effective and then justify a 'stealth' coating for mines (a "small" armor, bascially) you might unbalance other aspects of the game by making cloaking too easy and pervasive. On the other hand, it seems absurd to allow a more effective stealth armor only for mines and not for ships. Or does it? Maybe you could say that mines don't contain active power sources (engines and such) and so can use a better stealth armor? You could create a 5kt "mine armor" in the mine tech field and have increasing levels of effectiveness. Then the mine "hulls" themselves could be changed to "normal" units without inherent cloaking abilities. The small mine would just have room for one warhead and the cloaking armor. Hmmm... maybe this is doable.

Now... if we can just get a real "to hit" probability for mines instead of this demolition charge effect that we have now.

[This message has been edited by Baron Munchausen (edited 28 November 2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 28th, 2000, 09:17 AM
Jubala's Avatar

Jubala Jubala is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Linköping, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 504
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jubala is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Some thoughts on mines and mine sweepers

I just want to throw in my support for changing mines like Lintman (and others) suggested. Or at least adding the possibility to do it with the textfiles. As it is now it's just absurd.

Just how do mines detect ships anyway? Do ships actually sail into the mines (yeah, right!) or are the mines "seeking" in some fashion? I tink the size and maybe speed of a ship should also affect the probability to hit. An escort would have a better chance of getting through then a Dreadnought. Would add incentive to use smaller hulls throughout the game. Having speed affect the probability to hit might not be doable as ships don't have speed per se, only movement points.

Anyway, I agree something has to be done. It just seems plain weird any ship entering a sector will just go seek out and hit the one single mine there. Could make sense coming through a warp point. Probability to hit should be somewhat higher when coming through a warp point come to think about it.

Thinking of sweeping, it also seems a little weird the sweepers actually find all the mines. Makes sense as they work now, but if all our whishes make it in I think it should be possible for the sweepers to miss a couple of mines. The less mines that are left in a sector the harder they are to find and you can never be absolutely certain you got them all unless you sweep the sector thourogly for quite some time. Some probability of mines left value would be good to have in that case, accesed some way via the blue rectangular signifying a known minefield.

What if there's enemy mines and friendly mines in the same sector? Gotta be mighty hard to just sweep the enemy ones. What then? Sweep them all?
__________________
You don't go through the hardships of an ocean voyage to make friends...
You can make friends at home!
-Eric The Viking-
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.