|
|
|
|
|
March 17th, 2004, 06:17 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Observations after a month of play
OK.
|
March 17th, 2004, 06:33 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Observations after a month of play
Bogus showed up in one of my SP games the other night. Think I was playing Ulm. I ran his kill total up to several hundred before I just left him alone and started concentrating on the AIs. That wraith sword on a regenerative creature with his other items is nasty.
|
March 17th, 2004, 07:08 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Observations after a month of play
Quote:
Originally posted by tinkthank:
Yes, I do compete for them.
I meant: 100 GP worth of E-Knights is better than 100 GP worth of anything else (unless you count fully upgraded and equipped high-research-level mages). That is what I mean by "too powerful".
And 20 Crossbows is slightly more than a handful in my book. But then again, my book is entitled Analytik und Ethik der Namen, so that probably means squat.
|
That's the point of mercenaries though. They are supposed to be better than what you could buy for the same gold cost. Hector's Heavy Horse for example would cost far more than 220 gold if you recruited them yourself.
|
March 19th, 2004, 12:20 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Observations after a month of play
Quote:
Originally posted by tinkthank:
I agree that Mercs, at least some of them, are often too powerful. Certainly the Eternal Knights are. I also slavishly recruit all the mercs I can, whenever I can, even if it is only simply to keep my enemies from recruiting them.
|
This is actually a realistic strategy: In ancient times, rulers *DID*, in fact, hire mercenaries often for the purpose of denying them to their enemies, not to mention keeping unemployed mercenaries from becoming bandits.
If you feel a merc is too powerful for its asking price, and people agree, that mercenary company will be quickly bid up in price to whatever people feel it's actually worth. If you're getting them at bargain basement prices, people must not feel they're worth hiring.
|
March 19th, 2004, 03:00 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Würzbueg, Germany
Posts: 397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Observations after a month of play
Quote:
OTOT: nope, I teach philosophy at a German university and research at a philosophical research institute.
|
Nice, which university? I am thinking about studying philosophy next year, so maybe you can give some recomendations.
|
March 19th, 2004, 05:04 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pembrokeshire, Wales
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Observations after a month of play
Quote:
Originally posted by Norfleet:
In ancient times, rulers *DID*, in fact, hire mercenaries often for the purpose of denying them to their enemies, not to mention keeping unemployed mercenaries from becoming bandits.
|
Now that could be a fun random event - mercenaries who remain unemployed for too long start randomly pillaging provinces for cash!
__________________
Thtrap it to the bench and put a good thick bolt of lightning through it, that'th our motto. That'th how you tetht thomething!
- Igor
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|