|
|
|
 |
|

January 9th, 2009, 05:49 AM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
I suppose I could have posted before the rollback and collected opinions, but it seemed like that would lead to even more confusion and delay (and possibly even more bitterness about the final outcome). In any case I certainly take no offense at the idea of another admin, if someone wants to volunteer to take Ironhawk's spot and let me go back to being back-up admin. 
|

January 9th, 2009, 06:16 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
I do
I'm already admining two games so this will be my 3rd but I think I'm up to it and would thus be able to take some of the burden from you QM.
One thing to note though is that I'll be completely offline during March (family trip).
|

January 9th, 2009, 06:33 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Ok, welcome to our new overlord, Wraithlord!
|

January 9th, 2009, 06:49 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Cool. Glad I can help
First order of business is pitch in the effort of finding Utgard a sub. What's that I heard about Baalz taking over?- Is it true?- If so the search over, otherwise I'll make an additional post for a sub.
QM, do you know whether or not namad had a pwd in place?
|

January 9th, 2009, 06:58 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Quote:
Originally Posted by WraithLord
Cool. Glad I can help
First order of business is pitch in the effort of finding Utgard a sub. What's that I heard about Baalz taking over?- Is it true?- If so the search over, otherwise I'll make an additional post for a sub.
QM, do you know whether or not namad had a pwd in place?
|
I do not know about a password, but I changed the llamaserver utgard e-mail to Baalz's, so he should soon be able to tell us. I think he'd prefer if it was a temp sub spot though, so the hunt continues for a perm sub.
|

January 9th, 2009, 07:06 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lingchih
No replies? Then, very well. We are attacking Utgard with all out might this turn.
It does not matter who, if any, takes over Utgard.
If you guys had just avoided a rollback, this would not have had to occur.
|
Yes, I'm taking over Utgard and I'll be crushing Midgard. Cheers!
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|

January 9th, 2009, 09:36 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Welcome Baalz. Thanks very much for subbing.
Sorry all about the rant last night.
|

January 9th, 2009, 11:37 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Oh, and I also rescind the declaration of war on Utgard. I was angry last night, and vented too much. Namad's bugging out and the rollback had nothing to do with Baalz. There's no reason to go to war over something that was not his fault.
|

January 10th, 2009, 12:30 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
No hard feelings at all, obviously had nothing to do with me. Utgard is, however, going to have to have to withdraw from the anti-gath alliance. Nothing to do with Midgard, just the fact that the state things are in right now leaves the cost benefit at Utgard fighting over scraps ending on the very short list of targets of the next dogpile. I'll be honoring all NAPs (please let me know if you have one with Utgard) and keeping the lands I hold as of this turn. Anyone who doesn't speak up after the next hosting I'll consider to not have a NAP with.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|

January 10th, 2009, 01:20 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 12
Thanked 86 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Man, if Calmon's handing out "get out of war with all your conquered provinces free" cards I want one too.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|