|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

January 23rd, 2017, 06:11 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,678
Thanks: 4,113
Thanked 5,900 Times in 2,905 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
RE: T-84 turret armour---------Either you or someone else already brought this up and it's already been adjusted
|

January 24th, 2017, 02:39 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,867
Thanks: 809
Thanked 1,368 Times in 1,024 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
First things first: I checked Russian UNIT 697 it shows the T-72B3M/B4 which in itself is it's own tank and I understand what you did here. For further I refer you to Pg.47/Post 466.
The Russian T-72B1 really is just a slightly better T-72B w/o ATGM capability. It does create a little dilemma because if I remember correctly the T-72B, B1 & B2 all became operational in 1985. But there's no denying that the T-72B1 was updated with the "White Eagle" Pkg. and were operational by 2012, have (are seeing) seen combat in the Ukraine and having been deployed to the "Eastern Front" to include a new gun etc. etc. as I posted last night concerning Nicaragua having them as well. This is the tank I propose for Russia. The question again is do we have to enter the original unmodified one?
Ukraine/Thailand: OPLOT-T as both these countries have named it, is on track for Thailand to receive the rest of their order of tanks by late Fall as has been posted by me and widely on the net. Yes production was curtailed for national defense purposes, however a second production line was opened late last Fall to fulfill this order as noted. Since it was brought up and Don certainly knows by now how I follow up on equipment I've submitted (Or related to them.) wouldn't be surprised that again as mentioned yes Thailand was forced to "stop gap" the situation by ordering tanks from China. This had nothing to do about the OPLOT-T's performance, they are very happy with it's performance, but, to simply to meet their immediate national defense requirements.
http://www.uawire.org/news/ukraine-p...ks-to-thailand
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the...ia-being-17817
http://www.armyrecognition.com/janua..._10301176.html
Ukraine: The T-80U and T-80UD (Mostly) are currently in service at around 270 - 275 tanks depending on source. Also the Ukraine never fielded the T-80, they just built them for Russia. It would seem they from Russian feedback (?) and from their own building experiences (?), saw the same flaws with the T-80 and went to their own modified T-80U/UD models as shown in ref. 2 below. The first ref. is from a Russian and I'm assuming a journalist as he posted some pictures of the OPLOT-M. About three posts down he lists the UAF tanks that have seen combat in Eastern Ukraine.
http://sturgeonshouse.ipbhost.com/in...lat-and-other/
https://www.forecastinternational.co...DACH_RECNO=422
If the T-80 is in the Ukraine OOB, I don't believe it's ever been fielded. I do believe they had some after the Cold War ended but brought them to the above discussed standards. Note: Only Russian and possibly East German troops operated them (?) however, they were definitely stationed there.
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the...disaster-13550
Note: Russia has been bringing back the T-80 over the last few months. They've been updating them first before deploying them. All T-80 Russian models were to have been retired by 2015. However given the the current political situation the existing variants, to include the T-80U, will be held in service until 2020 pending arrival in numbers of the ARMATA.
http://www.defense-house.com/defense...ve-until-2020/
http://carnegie.ru/2014/05/25/close-ranks/hbrg
Well it's getting late. I've seen in a couple of defense reporting sites and in a couple of business sites that the Ukraine took a major step in getting it's defense industry straightened out by hiring our recent former head of DARPA we would call that a "coup" in most circles.
http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...rpa-chief.html
https://sputniknews.com/military/201...prom-analysis/.
Related recent Ukrainian Posts: Pg.48/Post 472 & Pg.46/Post 457.
Regards,
Pat

__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
Last edited by FASTBOAT TOUGH; January 24th, 2017 at 02:47 AM..
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FASTBOAT TOUGH For This Useful Post:
|
|

January 24th, 2017, 12:45 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,867
Thanks: 809
Thanked 1,368 Times in 1,024 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
Posted today, a lesson in economics for a country in a state of war. This is a good self assessment of Ukraines situation. Consider this a follow up to the last and previous posts where noted.
http://www.unian.info/economics/1739...-thailand.html
More on the T-80, second ref. might address some of the armor protection questions...
http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/USSR/T-80.php
http://www.fprado.com/armorsite/T-80U.htm
I also believe the T-84 (Sometimes referred to as JUST the OPLOT.) is still in Ukrainian service.
Regards,
Pat

__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
Last edited by FASTBOAT TOUGH; January 24th, 2017 at 01:00 PM..
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FASTBOAT TOUGH For This Useful Post:
|
|

January 24th, 2017, 01:30 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 121
Thanks: 63
Thanked 63 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
These armor values ( upper range guesstimates) are clearly referring to Oplot-M tank not base T84, it's pure logic that a 80's turret with rubber "composite" and not DU cannot have Chobham armor RHA. But It has already been correct so ok.
However, I Can only thank you for your steady hard work towards game perfection 
|
The Following User Says Thank You to luigim For This Useful Post:
|
|

January 25th, 2017, 03:33 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,867
Thanks: 809
Thanked 1,368 Times in 1,024 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
Talk about all in on the Ukrainian Eastern Front and from the Russian source I've mentioned and if you notice he does use the word " possibly" where noted, gotta be a reporter...
Ukraine: Tanks used by UAF in Eastern Ukraine:
T-64 modifications and versions: A, B, B1, B1V, BV, B1M, BM1M (for Kongo), BM "Bulat";
T-72 modifications and versions: B, BA or BM, possibly UMG, AV, UA1 (for Ethiopia);
T-80, possibly U or UD.
Rebels even better and you'll love this...
List of rebels vehicles is pretty much the same ( T-80U/UD was captured, but i didn't saw it in action), with exception of single IS-3, T-55 and T-34-85 and T-72B3.
Ukraine adds a trophy as well a T-72B1...
https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/co...russian_t72b1/
What's striking me now is, I was so focused on all these other tank issues of the last couple of days that I never realized how many T-72B1 tanks the Russians are using in the field now. And no, I'm not talking about the " White Eagle"
version they operate along with Nicaragua as already posted. I'll tell/show you the most obvious way to tell the B1 from the B1 "White Eagle" after this unless Don has questions I promise to " move along little doggy" as they might say around Texas and such.
1)  2)
3)
1&2) It should be fairly obvious that the Russians have upgraded these T-72B1 tanks and what sticks out to me is the ERA is of a newer type possibly Kontact-5.
3) Shows one of the Nicaraguan T-72B1 "White Eagle" tanks I chose this shot to more clearly demonstrate "It ain't a White Eagle" w/o the following...
The commanders 360 panoramic sight is mounted on a " stovepipe" as shown on the left/aft side of the turret. This is what gives it a "Hunter Killer" capability. This sets it apart from all the Russian tanks in service that I'm aware of.
Also there's an obvious difference between the Russian "White Eagle" and Nicaraguan version as shown in picture #3 above. The Russian version uses the same RWS AAMG that's mounted on the T-72MS. Nicaraguan still shows a RWS with a standard AAMG.
Good Night or Morning wherever you may be.
Regards,
Pat

__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
Last edited by FASTBOAT TOUGH; January 25th, 2017 at 03:46 AM..
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FASTBOAT TOUGH For This Useful Post:
|
|

February 3rd, 2017, 01:51 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,867
Thanks: 809
Thanked 1,368 Times in 1,024 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
Well this ref. has made what I've been saying here for awhile about the T-84 in Ukraine use pretty " rock solid" now. Looks like the T-84 to the right is configured to be dozor blade ready. But what I'm looking at is the ERA pkg. on these tanks without the time now to get a closer look, my first reaction to the picture and " second look" if you will, is that the ERA mounted is the NOZH version carried on the OPLOT-M which is of a very advanced type.
http://www.janes.com/article/67465/u...ond-debaltseve
http://www.morozov.com.ua/eng/body/t84protection.php
According to KMDB above it is NOZH ERA. You can access the rest of the stats for the tank through the above ref. upper left in blue. And for the 100th time and this site makes that distinction as well, the T-84 OPLOT (As sold to Pakistan.) and OPLOT-BM/or OPLOT-M (Same MBT) are different tanks. This distinction for some reason continues to cause issues.
Regards,
Pat

__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
|

February 3rd, 2017, 02:10 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 121
Thanks: 63
Thanked 63 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
The tanks in the photo are clearly t64bv, Pat!
Jane's error! You Can see the typical turret rear and side..
Typical kontakt1 blocks on the side skirts
https://www.unian.info/war/1758086-n...vka-video.html
These are the same tanks from the front
Last edited by luigim; February 3rd, 2017 at 02:36 PM..
|

February 3rd, 2017, 02:57 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 121
Thanks: 63
Thanked 63 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
Nozh ERA equips T64B1M and BM Bulat, not older T64BV with Kontakt1 in the photo!
T84 is an old model so it's equipped with surplus Kontakt-5 blocks from its T80 Hull or indigenous production Nozh ERA but It makes no difference because Nozh ERA shape is similar to Kontakt-5 shape externally, you can compare the shape of the side turret blocks in the link below to any T72 w.Kontakt5 (BM model 1989 or T72B3 or T90A) http://www.sdtb.kiev.ua/sdtb_defence_en.htm
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/t64b1m.htm
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/t84.htm
As you Can see, Nozh equips T64B1M
Duplet ERA that equips OplotM is a different Story: similar to Russian Relikt ERA
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/oplot_m.htm read here
So let's make clarity:
The tanks in Jane's photo are T64BV with old gen kontakt1
T64B1M and T64BM Bulat and base T84 (read up) with Nozh ERA, similar in appereance to Kontakt-5 so they should have similar values
Oplot-M is equipped with Duplet ERA (Nozh-2) with performance close/same as Relikt ERA
Last edited by luigim; February 3rd, 2017 at 03:09 PM..
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|