STM "Final v1.7.5" Discussion - Page 144

tesco samoa · #**1431** January 29th, 2004, 01:44 AM

fyron classic...

You know i am a little upset that my event did not make the cut.

You know the one where you show a picture of Captain Kirk pulling on his boots

and there is a population boom on the planet...

grimreaper · #**1432** January 29th, 2004, 01:48 AM

thank u so much for all your help captain kwok.

i got it working. you were right, it was in the wrong place

thank you for taking the time to help me

Captain Kwok · #**1433** January 29th, 2004, 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by grimreaper:
thank u so much for all your help captain kwok. i got it working. you were right, it was in the wrong place thank you for taking the time to help me

Hey, no problem.

Atrocities · #**1434** January 29th, 2004, 01:01 PM

What would happend if I removed the Bonus movement ability from the Impulse Engines?

Will they then work regardless of how many are on a ship design? IE designs with 2 empulse engines will provide movement?

The reason I am asking this is because as the game progress, the AI keeps designing larger ships that have no movement. They have warp drive, and one or two impulse engines, but as we know, they do not move.

And Kwok,

The Klingons have suffored a horrific loss to your forces. We now sue for peace.

Captain Kwok · #**1435** January 29th, 2004, 01:38 PM

Yes, the foolish attacking Klingons lost over 300 ships to my fleets - and now the only peace they will get is armed Romulan troops on all of their planets to ensure that Lord Atrocities' Klingons never act up again.

But I see UserX contains to maintain ships with the stacked sensors while attacking any ships I may have nearby. Nice of you to continue to use this exploit! I guess the Federation's superior production rate, population rate, larger ships, better armor, wasn't quite enough for you.

[ January 29, 2004, 16:29: Message edited by: Captain Kwok ]

userx · #**1436** January 30th, 2004, 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Captain Kwok:

But I see UserX contains to maintain ships with the stacked sensors while attacking any ships I may have nearby. Nice of you to continue to use this exploit! I guess the Federation's superior production rate, population rate, larger ships, better armor, wasn't quite enough for you.

We've refited over half our fleet and build new ships that do not have stacked sensors... BUT how about your torps that cut through shields???

userx · #**1437** January 30th, 2004, 04:32 AM

Actually, let's call for some other opinions, should the Federation be able to stack their sensors?

Fyron · #**1438** January 30th, 2004, 04:48 AM

Only if it does not result in a massive advantage. 10 points in CS and ECM advantage is what I would call massive, due to how SE4 combat works involving to hit chances.

userx · #**1439** January 30th, 2004, 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
10 points in CS and ECM advantage is what I would call massive, due to how SE4 combat works involving to hit chances.

Could you elaborate a little? I didn't know that... it's good to know. I have about a 10-15 advantage on the Romulans if I stack.

Fyron · #**1440** January 30th, 2004, 05:00 AM

Well, all bonuses add linearly. So a 10% advantage can change a 30% chance to hit into a 20% chance to hit. That is a pretty significant drop, and highly typical.