|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
May 23rd, 2024, 10:24 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
https://www.army-technology.com/news/news130202-html/
Quote:
The TSS system can provide direct fire capability to artillery platforms such as 155mm Howitzers and consists of the STAWS integrated with assisted-aiming fire control software, a commander’s display and a gunner’s display.
The assisted aiming software uses the laser-sighting capability of the STAWS to provide the Scorpion tank with advanced direct fire capability under all battlefield conditions.
|
I gave it
Ti/GSR 40
FC 20
RF 22
Start date 6/111
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 23rd, 2024, 12:39 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,774
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,295 Times in 972 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
Don,
Thanks, seems those numbers are more than reasonable.
Regards,
Pat
__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
|
May 23rd, 2024, 01:30 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
It is what I expect a " major upgrade" in 2011 that improved FCS to include the TI/GSR would be
I can see why the Thais like them and want to keep them.
One-- they are paid for.
Two-- they are small and have adequate firepower and because they are small ( 8 tons with low ground pressure) they can go places heavier vehicles cannot plus the Average Thai Male is under 5 and a half foot tall and weights 150 pounds...... good fit for a Scorpion
Last edited by DRG; May 23rd, 2024 at 02:17 PM..
|
May 31st, 2024, 07:07 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 101
Thanked 619 Times in 410 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
That weird new North Korean MBT seems to have possibly entered limited service:
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/ch-on...n-better/98052
Quote:
However, in 2020, an entirely new vehicle was unveiled as North Korea’s new best MBT. It was dubbed M2020 by Western analysts, but in May 2024, its name was revealed during an arms exhibition as Ch’ŏnma-2 / Cheonma-2 / (천마-2호).
In 2023, the Ch’ŏnma-2 was revealed with a new ERA kit, and in March 2024, the vehicle was shown during training exercises, with all 9 vehicles having entered service with the 105th Tank Division.
|
The name can be discerned from the background in the rough time frame of around 24:58 in this video:
https://youtu.be/x2uIsZsmCNE?si=LqBrOHsI3mEuYuON
where Kim visits a military institute.
|
May 31st, 2024, 08:39 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
If you see any more info on this...a top view would be great...... post it please
|
June 1st, 2024, 12:35 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,774
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,295 Times in 972 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
These might help first breaks it down equipment wise from their analysis and second bottom picture I think will be about as close to a "top down" as we'll get. Can't recall ever seeing a true "top down" on any of the newer NK tanks.
https://www.armyrecognition.com/news...-the-cheonma-2
https://armyrecognition.com/news/arm...an-t-14-armata
Got places to be.
Regards,
Pat
__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FASTBOAT TOUGH For This Useful Post:
|
|
June 2nd, 2024, 10:13 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
If anyone finds a reliable source that gives the length and width of the hull that would be helpful
Based on what little we have seen and various descriptions this is a very, VERY WIP first attempt
v3
Last edited by DRG; June 2nd, 2024 at 12:55 PM..
|
June 2nd, 2024, 01:11 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,774
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,295 Times in 972 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
Hardly anything out there but, this is the best I can find.
Overall Length: Approximately 12.4 feet (3.78 meters) 1.
Overall Width: Approximately 7.4 feet (2.25 meters) 1.
Overall Height: Not explicitly mentioned in the available sources.
Specifications:
Mass: Greater than 50 tons (estimated to be around 55 tons) 23.
That being said I think that's crap. We know they are building T-62/64 hulls and have "added" on to them to get some of the recent tanks they've come up with. It is thought they can now produce a limited number of T-72 hulls.
And if you account for only the weight issues the T-72 makes the most sense here as they averaged around 45 tons to the NK M2024 is thought to be more than 50 tons with most " pointing" it at 55 tons.
You could get there with the T-64 at 38 long tonnes/42 short tonnes but looking at the pictures from one of the refs I'm looking at of the engine compartment; I'm now thinking " Hmmm" I'll post it so you can take a look and it sits better in that lower profile that the M2024 seems to also have.
See what you think and remember the Ukrainians had gotten a 1200 HP engine into their newest versions.
https://tank-afv.com/coldwar/ussr/T-64.php
Regards,
Pat
__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
|
June 2nd, 2024, 04:40 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
Quote:
Originally Posted by FASTBOAT TOUGH
Hardly anything out there but, this is the best I can find.
Overall Length: Approximately 12.4 feet (3.78 meters) 1.
Overall Width: Approximately 7.4 feet (2.25 meters) 1.
Overall Height: Not explicitly mentioned in the available sources.
Specifications:
Mass: Greater than 50 tons (estimated to be around 55 tons) 23.
That being said I think that's crap.
|
I will agree with you on that
A T-55a hull was 6.2m so 3.78 is way off unless the NK's are CONSIDERABLY smaller than I thought they were
I suppose one way to measure would be to estimate the size of "Dear Leaders" head and then scale it from that but it's not really reliable
What this appears to be is something of a hybrid design like they took the Abrams ( and there was some chatter that they had one courtesy of ISIS ) and the T-14 . The raised engine compartment is reminiscent of the Abrams and it is a way to shoehorn a larger engine in
Eventually we will get better numbers and the T-72 theory is sound. That "society" will never invent anything new but they will adapt other peoples designs to their needs
My guesstimate hull is the same width as a T-72/T-90 but a bit longer and has 7 road wheels as does the Armata.... T72/90 have 6 so it's kinda a T-14/ Abrams mash up for the hull and something closer to a western style turret
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
June 2nd, 2024, 05:00 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT's
HOW could I resist??
Thats 11 with room on each side with 1/2 each so 12 kimheads wide
Google "How wide is the average male adult head"
Get "Average human head measures 6-7 inches in width"
Lets say 11" with the padded helmet 11" x 12 = 132" = 11 foot = 22 pixels wide which is right in the ballpark when using a kimhead scale
T-72 3.89 m (12 ft 9 in)
T-14 Armata is 3.5m wide which is 11.4829 ft
Last edited by DRG; June 2nd, 2024 at 06:44 PM..
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|