|
|
|
|
|
January 27th, 2004, 11:55 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
I also would be interested. Since no one is likely to take it/want it besides me, I'll take Mictlan.
|
January 28th, 2004, 12:47 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Count me in!
C'tis Ermor Marignon
|
January 28th, 2004, 03:23 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Yai! So it sounds like we've got some interest. I think Hosting once every 3 days should satisfy those of us who actually have work to do during the week =) At least, that sounds like the general concensus. If you want to drop it to 2 days, post a note and that might work too.
I'd be willing to host a PBEM game for it, unless anyone else wants to have that dubious honor.
So, pick a nation, and pick a second nation, and go ahead and pick a 3rd nation; post in order of which you want most, and where we have conflicts we can flip coins =)
Lear
Oh, I kinda like Pyth, although Arco is fun, as is Abysia.
|
January 28th, 2004, 04:38 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
I would like to play.
R'yleh, Man, Jotunheim is my order of preference.
[ January 28, 2004, 02:49: Message edited by: J Stanley ]
|
January 28th, 2004, 05:59 AM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Arco, Vanhiem, Tien Ch'i.
|
January 28th, 2004, 09:06 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
In order of preference:
Mictlan, Vanheim, Ry'leh.
|
January 28th, 2004, 10:19 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Jotun, C'tis, Man for me. And slow is fine for me as well
|
January 28th, 2004, 10:58 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Berlin
Posts: 300
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
A slow game? I am very in, if there's still a place...
C'tis, Atlantis, Caelum and then anything but Jotunheim is my order of preference.
__________________
Shut your mouth, it could open your mind! - from Skyclad's On With Their Heads!
|
January 28th, 2004, 11:35 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Pangea, Machaka, Man
|
January 28th, 2004, 11:58 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Hello!
Can I join?
Marignon, Pangea, Vanheim
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|